Causa Belli: Why We Fight

An ongoing survey of the current political, cultural and philosophical debate surrounding the War on Terror. Who are we fighting? Why are we fighting? What are we defending?

Friday, December 10, 2004

Radical Islam and Utopianism

Here is an interesting piece from the Foreign Policy Research Institute which, among other things, points out what could be called a utopian element in the thought of some of these radical Islamic groups:

The Khartoum period is critical, because what these violent Salafists basically want to do is to create a Salafi state in a core Arab country. Salafi (from Salaf, “ancient ones” or “predecessors” in Arabic) is an emulation, an imitation of the mythical Muslim community that existed at the time of Mohammed and his companion, which Salafists believe was the only fair and just society that ever existed. A very small subset of Salafis, the disciples of Qutb, believe they cannot create this state peacefully through the ballot-box but have to use violence. The utopia they strive for is similar to most utopias in European thought of the nineteenth to the twentieth centuries, such as the communist classless society.

There is a lot that can be said about all that. Thanks for the link, Fred.

I would write more, but, alas, as I wrote in my previous post, I am still swamped with end-of-semester work. I'm beginning to see the light at the end of the tunnel, though.
Comments:
Those who strive for Utopia often don't get it (tunnel vision). What we need to strive for is fixing the current problems that will help create the future...not being distracted by the "golden" future.
 
Thought you might like this for contrast, from Cardinal Bellarmino's "De Clericis" and "De Laicis": :Bellarmino said, "In a free state all men are born free." The Declaration of Independence says: "All men are created equal."
Bellarmino said:"Being naturally free, the people themselves hold immediately and directly the political power, with the result that it cannot be transferred to others." The Declaration says: "They(all men) are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights...and that to secure these rights Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Bellarmino said: "For a legitimate reason the people can change the government." The Declaration says: Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, or to institute new Government." p.. 201-202, Alfonso Zaratti, O.C.D., The Work of the Catholic Church in the United States of America, 1955 (translated from the Italian).
 
The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed
by Hilaire Belloc
http://www.tcrnews2.com/IslamBelloc2005.html

TCR Note: In presenting the following essay by the historian and Catholic apologist, Hilaire Belloc, it is not TCR's intention to foment any hatred against Islam---much less to advocate "war" upon this religion anywhere in the world or to resurrect a modern version of "Crusade" which the Church has left far behind. War does not work and it is morally wrong, the Catholic tradition teaches, unless one is immediately and directly attacked. But very much can be done, which has not been done, to prevent any such attack anywhere. We do not approve President Bush's war in Iraq and are convinced that the only way to get along with Islam is through mutually respectful dialogue, careful immigration quotas where peoples of contradictory worldviews are apt to conflict, seeking redress of the root economic and moral causes of some Islamic distrust of the west, namely imperialistic exploitation of others in the interests of protecting "vital interests," (oil, etc), military occupation of Islamic countries, pornosophic decadence, etc. The purpose in presenting this essay is to provide historical and theological context alone. Belloc's prophesy about the return of Islam is instructive, and thus it is all the more urgent for Christians to take a sober assessment of the present, while not repeating the mistakes of the past. -----Stephen Hand, editor, TCRNews.com
 
What is TCR News? Are they opposed to *any* use of force against terrorist organizations and the rogue states that protect them? "But very much can be done, which has not been done, to prevent any such attack anywhere. We do not approve President Bush's war in Iraq and are convinced that the only way to get along with Islam is through mutually respectful dialogue, careful immigration quotas where peoples of contradictory worldviews are apt to conflict, seeking redress of the root economic and moral causes of some Islamic distrust of the west, namely imperialistic exploitation of others in the interests of protecting "vital interests," (oil, etc), military occupation of Islamic countries, pornosophic decadence, etc. The purpose in presenting this essay is to provide historical and theological context alone." What do they suggest we do about the immediate threat???
 
Post a Comment
Who Links Here